Thanks for re-sending. FYI the "v2" goes for all the patches in the
thread, not just the one you actually changed. If you want to be
extra-clear you could add a "Changes in v2:" header to each patch.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Punit Vara <punitv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> + if((pwm_id <3) && (pwm_id >=0)) {
> + switch(pwm_id) {
> + case BBB_PWMSS2:
> + switch(pin_no) {
> + case BBB_P8_13_2B:
> + REG(AM335X_PADCONF_BASE +
> BBB_CONTROL_CONF_GPMC_AD(9)) = BBB_MUXMODE(BBB_MUX4);
> + break;
> + case BBB_P8_19_2A:
> + REG(AM335X_PADCONF_BASE +
> BBB_CONTROL_CONF_GPMC_AD(8)) = BBB_MUXMODE(BBB_MUX4);
> + break;
> + case BBB_P8_45_2A:
> + REG(AM335X_PADCONF_BASE +
> BBB_CONTROL_CONF_LCD_DATA(0)) = BBB_MUXMODE(BBB_MUX3);
> + break;
> + case BBB_P8_46_2B:
> + REG(AM335X_PADCONF_BASE +
> BBB_CONTROL_CONF_LCD_DATA(1)) = BBB_MUXMODE(BBB_MUX3);
> + break;
> + default :
> + printf("Invalid pin for module 2\n");
> + break;
> }
This is still returning true for error cases. What happens if the user
selects a valid PWM ID but an invalid pin?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
