>> diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/mutexgetprioceiling.c >> b/cpukit/posix/src/mutexgetprioceiling.c >> index 2df4776..eda02cb 100644 >> --- a/cpukit/posix/src/mutexgetprioceiling.c >> +++ b/cpukit/posix/src/mutexgetprioceiling.c >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ int pthread_mutex_getprioceiling( >> _POSIX_Mutex_Acquire_critical( the_mutex, &queue_context ); >> >> *prioceiling = _POSIX_Priority_From_core( >> + &_Scheduler_Table[ 0 ], > Why not _Scheduler_Get_own(executing)? Does it matter which scheduler > control is used. > > >> @@ -56,13 +52,26 @@ int pthread_mutex_setprioceiling( >> the_mutex = _POSIX_Mutex_Get_no_protection( mutex ); >> _Assert( the_mutex != NULL ); >> >> + scheduler = &_Scheduler_Table[ 0 ]; >> + > ditto. > > -Gedare Nevermind, I see it is dealt with later by the map function. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- [PATCH 14/16] score: Move _RBTree_Insert() Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 16/16] score: Add thread priority to scheduler node... Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 01/16] posix: pthread_mutexattr_setprioceiling() Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 05/16] posix: Delete POSIX_API_Control::schedparam Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 06/16] posix: Rework sporadic server scheduling pol... Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 12/16] score: Modify release job scheduler operatio... Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 02/16] posix: _POSIX_Mutex_Default_attributes Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 03/16] posix: Delete POSIX_API_Control::ss_high_pri... Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 07/16] posix: Make POSIX API aware of scheduler ins... Sebastian Huber
- Re: [PATCH 07/16] posix: Make POSIX API aware of sche... Gedare Bloom
- Re: [PATCH 07/16] posix: Make POSIX API aware of ... Gedare Bloom
- [PATCH 04/16] posix: Delete POSIX_API_Control::schedpolicy Sebastian Huber
- [PATCH 15/16] score: Move _RBTree_Find() Sebastian Huber