On 03/05/16 04:27, Chris Johns wrote:
On 02/05/2016 20:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
what is the benefit of the Monkey HTTP server compared to Civetweb?
It is not mongoose or civetweb. :) Originally when I started looking
at Monkey I was looking for something new to give us options and I
still think this is something we should consider. I am happy to see
both supported.
It is nicely implemented and there are a couple of people looking
after the code base and the related project. I like the idea of a plug
in interface which can be statically linked.
We had issues with kqueue in the new stack but I am sure we can find a
suitable way to integrate it with RTEMS.
What are these issues with kqueue?
I also think we should see if we need the sock pairs to manage events
or we could see if we can map at a different layer and use something
better suited to RTEMS.
The socket pairs are supported in the new network stack.
The thread stack allocation could be improved, but this is not the
first time we have come across issues in this area.
Chris
What is the issue here? Maybe we should add tickets for all of these
problems.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
