P.S. might be worth it to open a ticket related to civetweb and #update it from these patches.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > Is the plan eventually to be able to use the upstream civetweb? or to > track it with our own copy? > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Christian Mauderer > <christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> This patch series replaces the mongoose webserver by its still MIT >> licensed fork civetweb. >> >> Please note that I try to get some (currently two) of the patches >> directly into civetweb too. But I think that it might need some time and >> adaption till they are accepted. So I thought that adding them to RTEMS >> would still make sense as a working interim solution. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
