On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Aun-Ali, > > I think you removed a bit too much from some tests. You should only remove > the task note aspect of a particular test. Tests that deal with task notes > only should be remove completely. > > Here are some notes which might help on the tests: + tm08 - remove specific uses of notepads + tmoverhd - same + mp02 - remove test. Functionality of polling for something to happen is covered in at least mp04 + spnotepad01 - remove test + spnotepad02 - remove test + sptask_err04 - remove specific uses of notepads + sp07 - remove specific uses of notepads Please make sure the patch includes an explanation of the change. I think it is close. I will check the GCI time for you. > With respect to the documentation, it is undecided what we do here, see my > last comment to previous patch. > > I am fine with him ignoring the docs. I think we need to add a transition section with guidance and most of the notepad information disappearing. Honestly, we should be better about adding transition guidance as APIs get modified or deleted. And with the shift in new APIs in 4.11, we should add guidance on why these are better and should be used instead of something that existed before and is still there. Like task variables vs. TLS or keys. Liam.. ignore the documentation. Sebastian and I can figure something out. > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
