On 21/12/15 20:15, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Dec 21, 2015 1:07 PM, "Sebastian Huber"
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>
> Do we want to remove the task note functions so that an application
gets compiler and linker errors or warnings? Or do we make the
functions empty and return an error status code?
These were really bad APIs long before SMP was a consideration. I
would be happy to see them completely gone.
We need to capture their removal in a 4.12 release notes with
transition info. We weren't good at this for 4.11. Perhaps the manual
can replace the text section on them with a note they are gone as of
4.12 and you should use TLS or keys.
I updated the tickets.
For the documentation, should we add a chapter for deprecated/removed
directives or should we keep the documentation of deprecated/removed
directives and mention their status in place?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
