On 12/11/15 17:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Since we have now the RSB, I prefer to avoid autoconf stuff and instead force users of the master branch to update their tool chain.
I agree. Easy to add, difficult to remove.
The difficult part is to set up your development host to be able to build the tools with RSB the first time, but to build the tools a second time is easy, you just have to wait a couple of minutes.
I cannot personally cover all the hosts being used and need to rely on feedback in the form of documentation updates.
I am starting to think the RSB needs to learn more about hosts to help here. I am thinking of adding support so a package can specify something that has to be present and per hosts support translates that to a specific host set of packages or commands that are needed. Maybe then I can receive patches for those files and capture the information new users need.
Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
