On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 12/05/15 06:49, Martin Galvan wrote: >> >> Certainly! This filesystem has been so far implemented in Linux, so >> I'd assume it's GPLv2. > > > Would it be worth contacting the developer/maintainer and ask about a dual > license or something we can use?
We are in contact with him (jaegeuk....@gmail.com), we can ask however, Martin, how much Linux code you plan to actually re-use? Anyway, I will ask about this in a separate mail. > >> If this isn't compatible with the RTEMS >> license, perhaps we could distribute it separately through the Source >> Builder. > > > The configurations in the master repo for the RSB need to follow the same > rules as RTEMS in regards to licenses. It becomes too difficult to place the > responsibility on to our users. > > The RSB should support out of tree configurations if set up correctly. This > means you could maintain and release a configuration file the RSB can use to > build a GPL package. > > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Daniel F. Gutson Chief Engineering Officer, SPD San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5 Córdoba, Argentina Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211 Skype: dgutson LinkedIn: http://ar.linkedin.com/in/danielgutson _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
