On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> >> We probably always want the best infrastructure. And it we want to keep > >> hosts > >> moving forward, we will end up wanting to back port patches frequently. > > > > Would we be moving 4.11 to gcc-6? I just do not know but the > > gcc-common.cfg could result in cross-talk. > > > I agree with branches simply for this reason. We want to keep > "rolling" certain include config files to keep them up to date, which > means we have to archive the release configs anyways, so we should > have a separate copy of these files for the release versions. Just > making that separate copy be a branch simplifies a lot. > FWIW I cut the 4.11 branch on the RSB but I suspect nothing has been merged onto it. --joel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
