Am Friday 30 October 2015, 10:07:45 schrieb Sebastian Huber:
> On 30/10/15 09:53, Jan Sommer wrote:
> > Am Friday 30 October 2015, 07:50:16 schrieb Sebastian Huber:
> >> >How is this tackled in the glibc/Linux support? Is the exact layout of
> >> >the structures really interesting for Ada? I guess its sufficient to
> >> >tell Ada the size and alignment of pthread_attr_t for example.
> >> >
> > In Linux they do it like this:
> > type pthread_attr_t is record
> > Data : char_array (1 .. OS_Constants.PTHREAD_ATTR_SIZE);
> > end record;
> > pragma Convention (C, pthread_attr_t);
> > for pthread_attr_t'Alignment use Interfaces.C.unsigned_long'Alignment;
> >
> > That's probably the best solution. The gnat-rts changes values of the
> > fields only using the corresponding pthread_set functions.
> > If no one objects I would try to change the osinte-rtems.ads in the same
> > manner.
>
> This would be my preferred solution.
>
>
Ok, I have made the changes locally now, but how do I submit them to gcc?
Do I create patches only for gcc 4.9.x or do I need to get it into trunk and it
gets backported?
Their contribute page does not read as clear to me as the rtems one.
Best regards,
Jan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
