I don't have a problem on the surface of it, but can we get a clear statement of the licensing for the included code?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Isaac Gutekunst <isaac.guteku...@vecna.com> wrote: > Hi Devel, > > As mentioned earlier, Vecna has developed two BSP families using the HAL > code provide by ST as a foundation. The code isn't perfect, but it let us > get up to speed very fast, and provides a consistent abstraction across a > number of processors. > > I formatted a giant patch with all the relevant files needed for the new BSP > that will be arriving later. The plan is to get this code approved and > merged, and then add the BSP piece by piece to reduce the amount of code > coming in at once. > > > This includes some HAL files that we aren't using in the BSP just yet. Let > me know if we should remove them. It's a rather absurd amount of code :) > > > As before, I can't get git-send-email to work. In addition, the patches are > giant, so I've inserted links to files in Google Drive. > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxaqNLUoI5onZ3lUUDNrYXlyX1U > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxaqNLUoI5onM3JsenRJRkotWm8 > > > > -- > Isaac Gutekunst > Embedded Systems Software Engineer > isaac.guteku...@vecna.com > www.vecna.com > > Cambridge Research Laboratory > Vecna Technologies, Inc. > 36 Cambridge Park Drive > Cambridge, MA 02140 > Office: (617) 864-0636 x3069 > Fax: (617) 864-0638 > http://vecna.com > > Better Technology, Better World (TM) > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
