Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> schrieb am Fr., 14. Aug. 2015 um 04:26 Uhr:
> > > On August 13, 2015 7:15:08 PM CDT, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >On 14/08/2015 6:34 am, Daniel Gutson wrote: > >> I'd recommend a gcc plugin that generates your annotations; > > > >There is a Python framework for plugins to help make things easier ... > > > > http://gcc-python-plugin.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html > > I still don't understand the goal. I don't believe we have thoroughly > integrated covoar with gcno and gcov yet. Until we do that and identify gcc > issues, we shouldn't go down that path. > > Ok. Due to explanations of gcov that can be found e.g. in http://www.verifysoft.com/en_ctcpp_vs_gcov.html I thought it would be beneficial for us, when we integrate a tool to analyze code coverage also on the condition level. > >Chris > >_______________________________________________ > >devel mailing list > >devel@rtems.org > >http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > --joel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
