On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > > > On 8/7/2015 6:20 AM, Hesham ALMatary wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:07 PM, <e...@e-bbes.com> wrote: >>> >>> Zitat von Hesham ALMatary <heshamelmat...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>>> FYI, there's some initial port that runs hello world here [1]. I'll >>>> most likely work on rebasing and improving it soon, and perhaps revive >>>> the discussion of the upstreaming process, if it's of interest. >>> >>> >>> >>> Any chance, you could check it in? >>> >> I'd like to, but this will be subjected to some Xilinx licence issues, >> and my schedule. So no (timing) guarantees. > > > How much code is dependent on the Xilinx code? > Pretty much small. It's just some bits for UART lowest-level driver, which I think it can be easily replaced by any other uart16550/RTEMS driver. > As much as I hate to ask, is it the port or the BSP? > We really need a BSP that runs on a simulator to run tests > on with a port. > > There is nothing preventing you two from privately sharing > the code if you both meet the licensing terms. We just can't > merge it. > > --joel
-- Hesham _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
