On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@gwu.edu> wrote: > An x86_64 BSP would be a welcome addition for testing purposes, which > Amar is interested in, and for getting another 64-bit target ported. > The best place to start would be to read the CPU supplement and BSP > porting guide. Any new architecture will need a GCC toolchain, which > is relatively straightforward but takes some time to add the correct > config lines into GCC. I've CC'd Hesham, as he has the most recent > experience with porting RTEMS to new architectures, so he might know > where you can find more information. > You can imitate these commits [1, 2] for your new target. Newlib may need some work if it doesn't support the bare-metal architecture also.
[1] https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/commit/30f4c63c9530628a5a131f5c5d08c8a0253c0772 [2] https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-gcc/commit/f7051762470c42ce7f01baa7edeb113d51c7dd72 > Gedare > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:19 AM, punit vara <punitv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have thought of creating BSP for x86_64 but unfortunately I was busy >> in my exam and class hectic schedule.Shall I create or work on BSP >> for X86_64 ? >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Hesham _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
