Am Sonntag, 2. August 2015, 10:34:05 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > Top posting.. ada-tests now build on at least 4.11. I committed > the same patch to the master so they should build there. I > didn't run any. >
Quick question: How do I build the tests? The configure output says "--enable-tests enable tests (default:samples)" And looking at enable-tests.m4 it seems other options are yes and no, so the ada-tests will build if I set it to "yes"? Are they part of "make all", because I remember in the beginning I couldn't find the built samples. > --joel > > On 08/02/2015 10:20 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On 08/01/2015 12:48 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: > >> Am Samstag, 1. August 2015, 12:31:53 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > >>> On 08/01/2015 12:24 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: > >>>> Yes, I needed to add it to make the ada-examples compile. > >>>> > >>> Did it need to be included anywhere other than libgnat/adasupp.c? > >>> > >> Well, so far I haven't encountered the problem somewhere else, but have > >> been working with the Ada-examples mainly atm. > >> > >>> Sebastian reworked public vs private .h files and more includes moved > >>> to .c files. Since everything but Ada specific support files compile > >>> on every target, I am prone to want to fix the file that needs this. > >>> > >> I see. I just saw that pthreadimpl.h defines a call to a function it does > >> not include and thought it might be slipped at some point because it's not > >> used often. > >> I don't mind keeping it local. My goal is to spend less time with the > >> examples in the future anyway ;-) > >> > > I did a test build of 4.11 and master this morning. No patch was > > needed to built libgnat. > > > > But the Ada tests have an init.c which needs some love. Did you > > attempt to build the Ada tests? Just curious before I dive too far > > into fixing ada-tests/support/init.c. > >>> I would check for my patches but I appear to have deleted my RTEMS > >>> clone since then and lost the small patch I had. :( > >>> > >>> --joel > >>>> Am Samstag, 1. August 2015, 12:08:12 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > >>>>> Can you give a configuration or file that broke with this? > >>>>> > >>>>> I recall that I had a local patch that just added this line to an Ada > >>>>> specific C file. Nothing else broke. > >>>>> > >>>>> On August 1, 2015 5:51:31 AM CDT, Jan > >>>>> Sommer<soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de> wrote: > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h | 1 + > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> diff --git a/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h > >>>>>> b/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h > >>>>>> index f95ac9c..33fa33d 100644 > >>>>>> --- a/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h > >>>>>> +++ b/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h > >>>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > >>>>>> #include<rtems/posix/threadsup.h> > >>>>>> #include<rtems/score/objectimpl.h> > >>>>>> #include<rtems/score/threadimpl.h> > >>>>>> +#include<rtems/score/stackimpl.h> > >>>>>> #include<rtems/score/assert.h> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> #ifdef __cplusplus > >>>>> --joel > >>> > > > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
