----- Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> schrieb:
On 28/07/2015 5:51 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> This file is RTEMS specific and I am OK with it.

Do we have tests in RTEMS for this new API ?

This is a new API to RTEMS even if it is viewed as "internal" and the
RTEMS project should treat it like any other of the APIs it supports, ie
tests and documentation.

This is fully tested in test sptests/spsyslock01, see for example:

https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-July/012004.html

In terms of documentation, where would you add it? Most functions are pretty self explanatory (e.g. _Semaphore_Post(), _Mutex_Acquire(), etc.) and do what they are expected to do usually. All of them have a simple implementation.


>
> Sebastian is about to go on holiday so it would be appreciated
> to get this approved before he leaves.
>
> OK to commit?
>

Should we resolve the testing and documentation first ?

Since testing and documentation will be contained in RTEMS I would really appreciate if we can commit this Newlib patch first since RTEMS and GCC patches depend on it.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to