On 7/15/2015 2:51 PM, Martin Galvan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Pavel Pisa <p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> wrote:
Hello Martin,
Try to help us when we try to do TMS570 RTEMS work based
on my belief that it worth to be done for RTEMS but
without any actual or directly foreseen project/funding
backup. Try the code it would ease and shorten this
discussion. Or found another issue. But is the way forwad
instead of need to describe he problem third time.
Fair enough. I'll go ahead and update to the latest mainline, then
I'll test this patch. If you want to commit this in the meanwhile it's
fine for me if Joel thinks it's ok.
I don't have this hardware but it looked benign and fixing a bug
caused by recent timecounter changesto me.
FWIW I will wait until the morning to branch but think this patch
is OK and would like me or someone else to commit it if that's the
general consensus.
However (and forgive me for insisting on this so much), I'd still like
to know why we have to drop the HALCoGen formula. If we definitely
have to drop it, as a maintainer I'd appreciate a detailed comment
explaining why we did it.
That's a reasonable question.
Thanks a lot!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
