On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Peter Dufault <dufa...@hda.com> wrote:
> In updating the Phytec MPC5554 to this mornings build I see a large code size
> increase. It will no longer fit in the 2MB FLASH on the MPC5554, which is a
> problem. Here are the sizes of the binaries, the first one built two days
> ago against the RTEMS in September and the second one using the identical
> user code base and this morning’s RTEMS. I haven’t done much to analyze this
> yet other than to verify it’s still being built with the same optimization
> flags.
>
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 pjd usergrp 1624684 Jun 26 09:42 fw.bin.gcc4.8.2
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 pjd usergrp 2017220 Jun 28 10:48 fw.bin
>
> Has anyone else noticed this? Does anyone regularly monitor the size of the
> test suite binaries to watch for changes? Are there new options that should
> be set to disable new features that add size overhead?
>
Monitoring the size of the binaries would probably be a good thing to
do especially with buildbot when that gets working.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
