This was posted to bugs and when I asked for patches, only got them
privately.

Comments?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Re: Some bugs in latest R­TEMS
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2015 08:34:00 -0500
From:   Круглов Сергей <skrug...@nm.ru>
To:     Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com>



Yes, see attach




Пнд 25 Май 2015 15:29:04 +0300, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> написал:

Can you provide patches?


--

diff -Naur rtems-masterA/cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_memfile.c rtems-masterB/cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_memfile.c
--- rtems-masterA/cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_memfile.c	2015-02-16 10:03:17 +0300
+++ rtems-masterB/cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_memfile.c	2015-05-25 16:30:07 +0300
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@
    off_t           new_length
 )
 {
-  unsigned int   block;
-  unsigned int   new_blocks;
-  unsigned int   old_blocks;
+   int   block;
+   int   new_blocks;
+   int   old_blocks;
   unsigned int   offset;
 
   /*
diff -Naur rtems-masterA/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadimpl.h rtems-masterB/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadimpl.h
--- rtems-masterA/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadimpl.h	2015-05-22 09:57:32 +0300
+++ rtems-masterB/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/threadimpl.h	2015-05-25 16:32:01 +0300
@@ -817,7 +817,11 @@
     &ran
   );
   *time_of_last_context_switch = uptime;
+#ifndef __RTEMS_USE_TICKS_FOR_STATISTICS__
   _Timestamp_Add_to( &executing->cpu_time_used, &ran );
+#else
+  executing->cpu_time_used += _Timestamp_To_ticks(&ran);
+#endif
 }
 
 RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE void _Thread_Action_control_initialize(
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to