On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 17/05/15 04:21, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> Not really related, but what is the "rule" for when we should use >> RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE versus being able to say "static inline"? > > > This file already used "static inline" and this is fine, since it requires > at least C11 or C++11. > > We should eliminate RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE and maybe define inline to > __inline__ if desired in basedefs.h. > OK this propoasl can go to a ticket for further discussion.
> -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
