----- Am 15. Mai 2015 um 20:07 schrieb Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
[...]
>> diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/src/timercreate.c b/cpukit/rtems/src/timercreate.c
>> index 0b1c44b..390c965 100644
>> --- a/cpukit/rtems/src/timercreate.c
>> +++ b/cpukit/rtems/src/timercreate.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,27 @@
>> #include <rtems/rtems/timerimpl.h>
>> #include <rtems/score/watchdogimpl.h>
>>
>> +void _Timer_Cancel( Timer_Control *the_timer )
>> +{
>> + Timer_server_Control *timer_server;
>> +
>> + switch ( the_timer->the_class ) {
>> + case TIMER_INTERVAL:
>> + _Watchdog_Remove_ticks( &the_timer->Ticker );
>> + break;
>> + case TIMER_TIME_OF_DAY:
>> + _Watchdog_Remove_seconds( &the_timer->Ticker );
>> + break;
>> + case TIMER_INTERVAL_ON_TASK:
>> + case TIMER_TIME_OF_DAY_ON_TASK:
>> + timer_server = _Timer_server;
>> + (*timer_server->cancel)( timer_server, the_timer );
>> + break;
>> + default:
> Should this be an error case?
No, but I add an _Assert( the_timer->the_class == TIMER_DORMANT ).
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> rtems_status_code rtems_timer_create(
>> rtems_name name,
>> rtems_id *id
[...]
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
