On 5/5/2015 3:03 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > This was already fixed by Hesham ALMatary: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=1602bf39733bf742de44663651818c94b9211e8c > > The m68k BSPs build with the current master. This is what happens when you do a test build and don't get to look at the results for days. It was a long week and nice weekend with Jordan graduating from college Sunday. :)
I am reverting these and repeating the testing. There were also some ARM BSPs which did not build before so that needs to be checked. Thanks for catching this. > On 04/05/15 23:34, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> At least all m68k BSPs were not compiling without this fix. >> --- >> c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c >> b/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c >> index 202ea8e..003d010 100644 >> --- a/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c >> +++ b/c/src/lib/libcpu/shared/src/cache_manager.c >> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void smp_cache_inst_inv_all(void *arg) >> >> #if defined(CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT) \ >> && !defined(CPU_CACHE_SUPPORT_PROVIDES_RANGE_FUNCTIONS) >> -static void >> +void >> _CPU_cache_invalidate_instruction_range( >> const void * i_addr, >> size_t n_bytes -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
