On April 9, 2015 7:10:55 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > >On 09/04/15 14:05, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> With the nanoseconds extensions this would simply not work. > >Sorry, I had this primitive ERC32 timer module in mind. In terms of >tickless operation there are not differences between the nanoseconds >extension and the timercounters. Both depend on the interval of the >hardware timer module.
And since I am concerned with time passage in the world while a virtualized container with RTEMS is not running, this shouldn't be a problem. To do long sleeps, this is indeed a real issue. Thanks. --joel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
