El 29/03/2015 20:52, "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org> escribió: > > On 30/03/2015 8:23 am, Daniel Gutson wrote: > > > > We are waiting for the (hopefully) last round of comments for our gdb > > pretty printers of glibc's NPTL. > > Do you have a suitable link ?
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-03/msg00833.html > > > Is there interest here for an RTEMS version as well? > > Yes. We have support for RTEMS here > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tools/gdb/python and posix.py > support is something I would like to add. > > To load build and install the rtems-tools package. The RSB does this now > and then in gdb do: > > (gdb) python import rtems > > and for classic API we have: > > (gdb) rtems task > > I have been working to clean up the package and something things in this > code base are present but need testing, eg the rbtrees.py. > > The posix support would be an Id wrapper for the POSIX class threads and > then the common thread code would be used to examine the thread. A nice > feature for posix thread display would mapping the start address to a > gdb function symbol to help users know which pthread is which. Thanks. I'll analyze this with my team and be back. Daniel. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
