On 2015-03-12 13:57 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 11/03/15 13:04, Amar Takhar wrote: > > On 2015-03-11 09:44 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> >We need at least three -I options, one for the BSP headers, one for the > >> >CPU headers and one for the rest. > > The current one uses only one -I because all paths will be explicit. Right > > now > > I've hacked around the problem with the header redirectors. > > For example in <rtems/score/percpu.h> we have a > > #include <rtems/score/cpu.h> > > We have one cpu.h per architecture port. How do you mange this with only > one include path?
You include two different headers: #include <rtems/sparc/cpu.h> #include <rtems/score/percpu.h> The names of some headers would have to be changed to avoid confusion. Right now this is solved with the header includers so it is not something we have to address quickly. Internal headers such as this should not be 'hidden' by way of using an include path. There are unique headers per architecture however they're currently hidden on the commandline and not visible in-source this is wrong. Amar. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
