Does it make sense to provide
rtems_set_errno_and_return_cast_value(_error, _cast_type,
_value)...and replace the other two macros in seterr.h?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/score/include/rtems/seterr.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/seterr.h
> b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/seterr.h
> index 1e9e0d0..a3a977d 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/seterr.h
> +++ b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/seterr.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,16 @@
> #define rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one_cast( _error, _cast ) \
> do { errno = (_error); return (_cast) -1; } while(0)
>
> +/**
> + * This is a helper macro which will set the variable errno and return
> + * the specified value to the caller.
> + *
> + * @param[in] _error is the error code
> + * @param[in] _value is the value to return
> + */
> +#define rtems_set_errno_and_return_value( _error, _value ) \
> + do { errno = (_error); return (_value); } while(0)
> +
> /**@}*/
> #endif
> /* end of include file */
> --
> 1.8.4.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
