On 3/2/2015 10:19 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I had only a brief view at the new features. Most stuff will probably > work with a moderate amount of work. In case you are interested in > specific features, then it would be nice to add some test cases to the > test suite, so that we know that it works or what to do. > > On 02/03/15 17:14, Daniel Gutson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I know this has been asked before. >> >> What's the status of the new C++ threading model implementation? I >> barely recall people saying that >> there were some features provided in the GNU's STL that uses POSIX >> features not currently >> implemented in RTEMS. I don't recall that as much as I recall concerns over the code not checking return statuses.
I think we are only missing a couple of pthread calls added in POSIX 2008. There may be a feature missing like an odd clock. But I don't think missing was the issue. >> We are interested in the C++0x/1y concurrency features for some >> non-real time software modules, >> so if somebody could save us some research time, would be very helpful >> to complete the implementation if needed. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Daniel. >> > -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
