Hello,

I work currently on concepts to implement mutex objects with SMP aware locking protocols. Currently this is MrsP [1] and OMIP [2]. The implementation should use fine grained locking. It turned out that the support for timeout makes the implementations much more complicated. With timeouts you can tear a resource dependency tree into two sub-trees at arbitrary positions and this makes traversal difficult (you can cut off the way back).

Is there a valid use case for a mutex obtain operation with a timeout in case the locking protocol aims to provide bounded wait times? We can probably also assume that the critical section has a bounded execution time.

[1] A. Burns , A. J. Wellings, A Schedulability Compatible Multiprocessor Resource Sharing Protocol -- MrsP, Proceedings of the 2013 25th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, p.282-291, July 09-12, 2013

[2] Björn B. Brandenburg, A Fully Preemptive Multiprocessor Semaphore Protocol for Latency-Sensitive Real-Time Applications, Proceedings of the 2013 25th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, p.292-302, July 09-12, 2013

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to