On 12/8/2014 1:12 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/12/14 21:56, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >> Thanks Joel and Gedare. I found it a bit tricky as I had to add >> epiphany to (hidden) aclocal/enable-smp.m4 files at c/src, cpukit and >> the root directory. > Yes, its bad to waste time on such stuff. Should we simply allow the > --enable-smp for all architectures? At least we should produce a > configure error on unsupported architectures and not these obscure > errors during build/link time. Let's leave it like it is and hope for a better build system. Most architectures we support don't have the hardware defined to support it. >> It now builds and compiles fine, and actually I >> can send some SMP messages to RTEMS on another core, but the current >> status of SMP/epiphany port is in its very early stages, and need more >> work. > For documentation see > > http://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/cpu/no_cpu/rtems/score/cpu.h > > and search for RTEMS_SMP. >
-- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
