Jennifer can you send Daniel a patch using just priority inheritance (with priority blocking)/and let him retest?
On November 12, 2014 10:14:10 AM CST, Jennifer Averett <jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com> wrote: >Daniel found a bug in smpschedaffinity05 where the semaphore was being >held by a task that was being switched out and the semaphore was not >released >because the task wasn't being switched back in at any point. This would >cause the >test to lock waiting on the semaphore and not finish. This set of >tasks request the >semaphore with a no wait option. I think the same thing can happen in > >smpschedaffinity02, and smpschedaffinity04. That is the reason for the >three patches. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sebastian Huber [mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:41 AM >> To: Joel Sherrill; Gedare Bloom; Jennifer Averett >> Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] smpschedaffinity05: Change semaphore >attributes. >> >> On 12/11/14 16:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > Daniel Cederman found a bug >> > in the semaphore used to protect the data used to control the >threads >> > and migration. >> >> What is this for a bug? >> >> -- >> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH >> >> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany >> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 >> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 >> E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> PGP : Public key available on request. >> >> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel