Hi
I just submitted my latest round of patches. With those applied,
things are in pretty good shape but help is needed to wrap up
the remaining issues. The biggest things to note are that:
+ the only warnings left in libcpu code is the PowerPC cache issue.
+ Only the following BSPs have warnings left in BSP specific code:
2 arm-nds (inBSP=1 inLibCPU=0)
5 sparc-erc32 (inBSP=1 inLibCPU=0)
5 sparc-sis (inBSP=1 inLibCPU=0)
3 arm-raspberrypi (inBSP=2 inLibCPU=0)
6 arm-rtl22xx_t (inBSP=2 inLibCPU=0)
7 arm-rtl22xx (inBSP=2 inLibCPU=0)
7 sparc-leon2 (inBSP=3 inLibCPU=0)
9 powerpc-t32mppc (inBSP=4 inLibCPU=2)
21 powerpc-mbx821_001 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-mbx821_002b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-mbx821_002 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-mbx860_001b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-mbx860_002 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-mbx860_1b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-pghplus (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
21 powerpc-tqm8xx_stk8xx (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
25 powerpc-mbx860_005b (inBSP=22 inLibCPU=0)
+ The arm BSP warnings are all for do_data_abort() and I am
hoping someone will step up and address that per Sebastian's
suggestion of just fix them properly.
+ The sparc BSP warnings appear to be things that have been
addressed in the leon3 but I don't know what was done. If
someone would look at those, it would be appreciated.
+ Thomas/Sebastian have committed to addressing the
mpx8xx based BSPs.
I am stepping back from addressing code in warnings in RTEMS
code for at least a week. I have a patch to newlib which might
address some of the printf() format warnings in shared and test
code. I want to make some progress on that.
Community help is required to wrap this up.
Thanks.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
