On October 18, 2014 1:53:50 PM CDT, Thomas Doerfler <thomas.doerf...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >Joel, > >we will see to this 'til Wednesday.
Thanks. I tried to start addressing these but the complexity of conditionals in the console driver led me to move on to other BSPs. I think that properly disabling what isn't used in a configuration and making methods static will fix most of the warnings. -+jo >CU, > >Thomas. > > >Am 17.10.2014 17:33, schrieb Joel Sherrill: >> Hi >> >> The only BSPs with more than 5 warnings in the BSP specific code >> are the following: >> >> 21 powerpc-mbx821_001 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-mbx821_002b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-mbx821_002 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-mbx860_001b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-mbx860_002 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-mbx860_1b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-pghplus (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 21 powerpc-tqm8xx_stk8xx (inBSgrep P=18 inLibCPU=0) >> 25 powerpc-mbx860_005b (inBSP=22 inLibCPU=0) >> >> Of the 188 unique warnings, 22 are in the mbx8xx BSP >> and 21 are in the tqm8xx BSP. This is over 20% of the >> remaining warnings. >> >> I would really appreciate it if these warnings could be addressed. >> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
