Hi, Thanks for providing these results. or1ksim related warnings should be greatly decreased after the latest two patches I submitted.
Regards, Hesham On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > Hi > > Attached is the set of unique warnings and list of warnings > count per BSP after committing all my patches. This is > with tests=samples and networking disabled. > > On 6 Oct, there were 1737 unique warnings. > Today, there are 759 unique warnings. > > The warnings break down in categories like this: > > 2 aggressive-loop-optimizations > 2 comment <== I just pushed a > fix for this > 5 cpp > 3 deprecated-declarations > 19 format= > 17 implicit-function-declaration > 5 int-to-pointer-cast > 2 maybe-uninitialized > 506 missing-prototypes > 17 nested-externs > 3 overflow > 1 pointer-sign > 6 pointer-to-int-cast > 1 strict-prototypes > 1 uninitialized > 46 unused-but-set-variable > 17 unused-function > 13 unused-variable > > If you are interested in helping, for many of the warnings, it is obvious > from the unique sorted list what BSP triggers the warning based on the > file name. If it isn't obvious, ask me for the BSPs triggering a warning. > > Again, help running these down is appreciated. > > -- > Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development > joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research > Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 > Support Available (256) 722-9985 > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel