I think thats all that i've changed. But a can send it as patch if you
can say me how do it.
On 01.10.2014 16:40, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 01/10/14 14:35, Мороз Олег wrote:
I've solved my problem using code changes
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/shared/comm/uart.c
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/shared/comm/uart.c
index 3c4d42a..3552fe6 100644
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/shared/comm/uart.c
+++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/shared/comm/uart.c
@@ -568,12 +568,13 @@ BSP_uart_termios_read_com2(int uart)
ssize_t
BSP_uart_termios_write_com1(int minor, const char *buf, size_t len)
{
+ if(len <= 0)
+ {
+ return 0;
+ }
assert(buf != NULL);
- if(len <= 0)
- {
- return 0;
- }
+
/* If there TX buffer is busy - something is royally screwed up */
assert((uread(BSP_UART_COM1, LSR) & THRE) != 0);
@@ -602,13 +603,13 @@ BSP_uart_termios_write_com1(int minor, const
char *buf,
size_t len)
ssize_t
BSP_uart_termios_write_com2(int minor, const char *buf, size_t len)
{
- assert(buf != NULL);
+
if(len <= 0)
{
return 0;
}
-
+ assert(buf != NULL);
/* If there TX buffer is busy - something is royally screwed up */
assert((uread(BSP_UART_COM2, LSR) & THRE) != 0);
Is it alright?
Yes, this looks all right, can you please send a complete patch.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
