On 14/07/14 17:40, Daniel Cederman wrote:
+static void all_cache_manager_smp_functions( size_t set_size,
+    cpu_set_t *cpu_set )
+{
+  rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines_processor_set( 0, 10, set_size,
+      cpu_set );
+  rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_data_lines_processor_set( 0, 10, set_size,
+      cpu_set );
+  rtems_cache_flush_entire_data_processor_set( set_size, cpu_set );
+  rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_data_processor_set( set_size, cpu_set );
+  rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_instruction();
+  rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_instruction_lines( 0, 10 );
+}

Here you have several NULL pointer accesses.

If you call rtems_cache_invalidate_entire_data_processor_set() on systems having a write-back cache, then you kill the stack frame and the test does weird things.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to