On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 14/08/14 16:15, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> E.g. most of the tests won't even start without modifications. So >>> >effectively I have to fall back to a polling driver for console if I >>> >want to run the tests unmodified, or is there any mechanism to generally >>> >increment the amount of timers for all tests? >> >> I don't think so. There are some BSP hooks for various features and >> default number >> of termios ports. But nothing specific to an object. >> >> I suppose one could be added but for orthogonality, it would make me >> wonder >> why we wouldn't also let you add a BSP factor on every Classic API object. >> Just thinking out load. > > > Its not only a BSP factor. It is also a per driver factor. Since the > console and clock drivers are optional if you make it only BSP specific, > then you have to overestimate. > Ah, that is a good point. The drivers that get used by the application should be determining the configuration requirements? -Gedare
> -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
