Hi If you take the patches in their entirety, most of the tests appear to be about 500 bytes smaller on the erc32.
None of the tmtests do priority based blocking so I can't report any changes there. There was historically a subroutine in the threadq calls for a discipline specific routine. Using the RBTree, this resulted in only 3-5 lines of code unique to the discipline in those discipline files. The other 20+ lines was duplicated. The last patch folds those subroutines into the main methods. There is still some room for clean up since the code that is in threadblockingoperationcancel.c is open coded there and three other places. So there are a total of four copies of this code in the tree. + rtems/src/eventsurrender.c + score/src/threadqdequeue.c + score/src/threadqextract.c + score/src/threadblockingoperationcancel.c Two of those need the debug check code and two do not. Also the method name isn't right for all four cases. It indicates its use on the "resource released in ISR" usage not the normal "clean up from blocking" case. Suggestions on a new name and whether this should be a real subroutine or a static inline is appreciated. Then I can rework and reduce the code duplication. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel