On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:32:31AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan <[email protected]>
The description is empty and this patch is rather pointless without 7/7.
Any reason you kept it separate from 7/7? At the very least this patch
needs a brief description.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
> ---
> include/linux/shm.h | 4 ++++
> ipc/shm.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/shm.h b/include/linux/shm.h
> index eca6235..ec36e99 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shm.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ static inline int is_file_shm_hugepages(struct file
> *file)
> }
> #endif
>
> +struct ipc_namespace;
> +extern int shmctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int shmid, int cmd,
> + struct shmid_ds __user *buf, int version);
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_SHM_H_ */
> diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
> index 5ac6aec..28a8b57 100644
> --- a/ipc/shm.c
> +++ b/ipc/shm.c
> @@ -605,8 +605,8 @@ static void shm_get_stat(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
> unsigned long *rss,
> * to be held in write mode.
> * NOTE: no locks must be held, the rw_mutex is taken inside this function.
> */
> -static int shmctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int shmid, int cmd,
> - struct shmid_ds __user *buf, int version)
> +int shmctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int shmid, int cmd,
> + struct shmid_ds __user *buf, int version)
> {
> struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp;
> struct shmid64_ds shmid64;
> --
> 1.5.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
