Bugs item #1818610, was opened at 2007-10-23 18:06
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1818610&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: modules
Group: ver 1.2.x
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Iñaki Baz (ibc_sf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: [lcr] load_contacts() forgets bflag of "location" table
Initial Comment:
In serial forwarding with different "q" values contacts bflags are forgotten.
I have this "location" table:
username domain contact received
cflags q
800 domain.org sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 sip:82.35.221.20:5060
192 0.80
800 domain.org sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5080 sip:82.35.221.20:5080
192 0.50
Both contacts behind NAT and different "q".
I fix NAT for each branch in "branch_route[1]" in case of parallel forking. It
works OK.
But since I added serial forwarding with load_contacts() and next_contacts()
after lookup("location") and next_contacts() in "failure_route[1]" NAT doesn't
work because those two functions forget the bflag(6).
In fact, the issue is worse since in "failure_route[1]" I do next_contacts()
but in this case the INVITE is sent to 192.168.1.133:5080 instead the public IP
!!!!
Is there any way to solve it? or is it a bug on lcr functions handling contacts
bflags and "received" field?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Iñaki Baz (ibc_sf)
Date: 2007-10-23 21:40
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1844020
Originator: YES
Ok, I'll install SVN version and try it.
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2007-10-23 21:30
Message:
Logged In: NO
i think this
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser?view=rev&revision=2696
fixes your problem.
because of the complexity, there will not be a backport to 1.2.
-- juha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Iñaki Baz (ibc_sf)
Date: 2007-10-23 21:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1844020
Originator: YES
Sorry, I forgot.
It's OpenSer 1.2.2-1 of Debian Sid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2007-10-23 19:40
Message:
Logged In: NO
when you file an item like this, please tell which version of openser this
applies to.
-- juha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1818610&group_id=139143
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
