Hi Di-Shi,
In SER, there is at least two parameters that are different for the development trunk and the upcoming SER 2.0: Debugging and the memory allocation. AFAIK, debugging is turned off in RC1, http://www.iptel.org/ser_2_0_0_release_candidate_1, while the type of memory allocation has been changed in cvs tagged rel_2_0_0 i.e. upcoming RC2. Thus, I recommend that you check out rel_2_0_0 from CVS.

There is also a question of which approach you want to take in making your tests: (1) standard config the way each project "packages" the server, (2) in some way modified config (turn on/off etc), or (3) finally an optimized config (which a service provider would do).

I'm sure every large-scale provider (which will be at risk of getting high bandwidth and CPU levels) have each their own tweaks, for example the locking mechanism used. I would love to have an iptel.org page that documents all the various tweaks (if people will share).
g-)

Di-Shi Sun wrote:
All,
This e-mail is follow-up to our previous posting about tests we performed at TransNexus comparing SER and OpenSER. Our tests were for wholesale VoIP carriers who want a straightforward, unbiased comparison of OpenSER and SER. As part of this goal, we purposely chose the simple implementation of building each software with default settings. Folks from the SER community have pointed out to us that building each platform based on the default configuration does not lead to an accurate comparison because debug and blacklisting settings for SER and OpenSER are different and favor the performance results of OpenSER. Since our goal is to provide users with the most accurate comparison possible, we are seeking feedback from both communities on what changes should be made to the SER and OpenSER compile/configuration options in order to measure an accurate comparison between the two software platforms. We are considering re-running the performance test with debug and blacklisting turned off for both OpenSER and SER based on advice from folks in the community that this configuration will produce a more accurate comparison. Does anyone else have any advice or input to offer before we re-run the Performance Comparison test? Thank you, Di-Shi Sun. ------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to