Rex Dieter wrote:
> At least some of these are epel-only packages (examples below)
>
> dead.package I thought was only applicable to packages that existed in
> fedora, then were EOL'd. Should that case be handled differently?
EPEL-only packages should have their devel branch (and any other Fedora
branches if they were already created) properly retired including adding the
dead.package file. It can say something like "EPEL-only package."
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
