Marcin: Oh. You said you upgraed to Rawhide. But you seems not actually using Rawhide repos.
-robin On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Robin Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Marcin: > > You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade > ffmpeg-libs'. > > There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And before f22 is released, you > are actually using the 'rawhide' repos of RPMFusion. But After f22 > released, RPMFusion f22 repos is then finally branched and the yum repo > configs are updated in new version of rpmfusion-free-release. So, if you > run a global 'dnf upgrade' before upgrade rpmfusion-free-release, you will > pull in some 'rawhide' packages from RPMFusion. > > -roibn > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> F22 got released so I upgraded my machine from F22 to rawhide. But as >> usual it meant rebuilding rpmfusion packages (as they do not support >> rawhide). >> >> All went quite good. Except installing: >> >> Error: package ffmpeg-libs-2.6.2-3.fc23.x86_64 requires >> libvpx.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed. >> >> Why's that? >> >> libvpx 1.4.0 bumped libvpx.so.1 -> libvpx.so.2 and I did not found any >> mail about it on fedora-devel ML (maybe such mails are not required, no >> idea - many such were sent). Most of rawhide is built against libvpx 1.3.0 >> so old soname is required. >> >> Simple 'dnf remove "libvpx.so.1()(64bit)"' on my rawhide shows 512 >> packages including wine, kde, gstreamer plugins and lot of other stuff. >> >> How to solve it? I am afraid that answer would be "wait 2 months, we will >> slowly solve it by new uploads" ;( >> -- >> devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > >
-- devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
