On 2/27/14, 4:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Chris Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jochen Schmitt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:08:46PM -0500, James Wilson Harshaw IV wrote:
>>>> A question I have is XFS worth it?
>>>
>>> I have done some testing with RHEL 7 Beta which use XFS as a default file
>>> system.
>>>
>>> I have to recorgnize, that the -r switch of the lvresize command doesn't
>>> cooperate
>>> with xfs in oppoiste of ext4.
>>
>> Where you growing or shrinking the fs, and was it mounted at the time, and
>> what error did you get? XFS doesn't support shrink, and only can be grown
>> online. I'm pretty sure lvresize -r supports xfs_growfs via fsadm.
>
> worksforme
>
> Starting with a 10TB XFS volume, 5TB x 5 disk VG.
>
>
> # lvresize -r -v --size 15T VG/LV
> Finding volume group VG
> Executing: fsadm --verbose check /dev/VG/LV
> fsadm: "xfs" filesystem found on "/dev/mapper/VG-LV"
> fsadm: Skipping filesystem check for device "/dev/mapper/VG-LV" as the
> filesystem is mounted on /mnt
> fsadm failed: 3
<snip>
> However, I don't know what "fsadm failed: 3" means.
fsadm.sh:
if detect_mounted ; then
verbose "Skipping filesystem check for device \"$VOLUME\" as
the filesystem is mounted on $MOUNTED";
cleanup 3
fi
...
cleanup() {
...
exit ${1:-1}
}
the script exits with error "3" meaning, well, "3," I guess, when the fs is
mounted. Not the nicest error reporting IMHO :)
-Eric
--
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
