On 26 August 2013 13:19, Alec Leamas <[email protected]> wrote: > As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in > current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports on > issues by package and packages by issue. > > We have discussed sending email about these results to the package owners. > Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it might be good if you check > your own packages, chances are that something otherwise unnoticed is > discovered. Please don't forget the README. > > For those interested in the overall distribution, the package by issue > reports perhaps also might add something as well as the 'stats' file in the > top dir. > > > --alec > > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.**org/pipermail/devel/2013-** > August/188133.html<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/188133.html> > [2] > http://leamas.fedorapeople.**org/fedora-review/tree/<http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/> > -- > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel> > Fedora Code of Conduct: > http://fedoraproject.org/code-**of-conduct<http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct>
>From the README: "The package reports all fail on CheckBuildInMock and CheckBuildRequires." I'd rather you didn't send out a mass email until I can filter these out see just the genuine failures. -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
-- devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
