On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> wrote: > Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with > 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as* > *a* *matter* *of* *law* copyright infringement had occurred for those 9 > lines.
Yes. And also told Oracle that it was very limited what they could claim as damage caused by the copyright infringement over those 9 lines. Yes, those 9 lines belong to you my precious butterfly. No, they are not significant and this is all a waste of time. m -- [email protected] [email protected] -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff -- devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
