https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838679
Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) > About the test suites, I think it should be acceptable to selectively > disable tests that are failing because of the unmet dependencies. What do > you think ? This may let packages get away with unnoticed bugs and issues. I'd consider this to be prohibitive, because Plack and its infrastructure are pretty comprehensive and security sensitive. Openly said, based on what I went through on Fedora (A need to closely track the upstream versions of several perl-Plack perl dependency), I do not see much chances of getting Plack into epel6 without major general upgrades to many other epel6 perl-modules (and may-be perl itself). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
