On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:24 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 7/26/11 1:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Yes, It got untagged. See last week's thread on this list:
> > Subject: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found"
>
> I thought there was a hard rule about not having nvrs go backwards, and
> if a bad build was put out, it should be fixed with epoch or other such
> NVR things to make sure the upgrade path continues. (that is once a
> build makes it out in the nightly repos)
I do not think it was so hard rule for rawhide - it depended on various
things whether it was needed or not.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
