On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 11:53:02AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 11:51 AM Arjun Shankar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Please, please, please, make that /usr/lib/tunables.conf.d/app.conf > > > > by default. As described below, this is clearly something that is > > > > part of the rpm and not "local configuration". > > > > > > > > > > I don't think this path exists. That's a glibc thing, I think, and the > > > doc about it doesn't indicate any hermetic /usr support. > > > > > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=manual/tunables.texi;h=828c68151ad887550430605f007e289b5235f110;hp=e1d9fbae9cebe961fe45203251a761c3323a9917;hb=fae194043a099d45c044c883467c934153ecc51f;hpb=fcea66cd4685f9f3719e09cac52c73b9ece4bade > > > > Upstream doesn't need to support multiple configuration directories. > > An appropriate "include" line in the configuration shipped by Fedora's > > glibc can solve this. We intend to ship appropriate configuration to > > allow drop-in files, and the /usr/lib route suggested earlier in this > > thread sounds like a reasonable one. > > > > Requiring /etc files to load /usr files violates the principle. It > needs to work the other way around.
"violates" is maybe a tad too strong. But it'd be great if this file was not needed at all. A config file to configure the standard location of other config files feels … superfluous. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
