On Tuesday, June 30th, 2026 at 15:41, Przemek Klosowski via devel <[email protected]> wrote:
> and attempt to address them IN WAYLAND: for instance, people miss the > multi-window statefullness and ability to re-constitute complex > multiwindow layouts... or the issue of middleware libraries you mentioned. At what point would Wayland simply become a second, distributed version of the X11 protocol by adding these features? Each protocol has their downsides, and upsides. Why should I improve Wayland compositors for instance, rather than create a new protocol from scratch, along with a reference implementation, that way, these problems can be avoided from the start? I don't know if adding to this complexity, and making each individual client/DE more monolithic, would be part of my personal plans. This is getting to be too off topic. I think a new email thread should be started somewhere (although I don't really know where). I'm not willing to get smote again by the Fedora gods. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
