I recently got some inactive packager notifications from what appears to be a fork of the inactive packager repo on forge.f.o
I initially replied as though it was legitimate, but I'm now wondering if this isn't actually legit activity at all. It looks like the legitimate notifications and issues are in the packaging/find-inactive-packagers repo, but these ones that I received came from a fork with the following subject line: [jspaleta/find-inactive-packagers] Inactive packager detected for user ctubbsii (Issue #335) (And another one from a duplicate issue #228, both issues having subsequently been deleted or marked private apparently, since I can no longer see either) Clearly the notification itself is a false positive, since I've had activity recently enough on bodhi, src, and devel@, that should have prevented me from being marked inactive. Does anybody know what's going on here? I'm thinking maybe people should be more careful about running this script from a fork? Or maybe the script itself should automatically detect that it's a fork and operate in dry run mode, without creating issues that tag people with false positives? But perhaps I'm misunderstanding and these were supposed to be legitimate notifications of inactivity? Regards, Christopher
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
